LAST DAY to win a Canon EOS R: http://freesdp.comCanon 24-105mm f/4R ($1,099): http://sdp.io/C105RCanon EOS R ($2,300): http://sdp.io/RWe've now taken over 1 Rafavox wrote: Very undecided between those 2 RF 24-105 F4 or RF 24-70 F2.8 I know the 24-70 has a excellent image quality and its better in low light, but for someone who uses the lens as walk around / travel and mostly landscape photography is a good to get the 24-70? not sure if will make a big difference in landscape photography. The RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM on test, however, is one of two more conventional, non-L-series options, the other being the Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS Macro STM.While it still commands a relatively Canon EOS R with 24-240mm at 62mm – f5.6 – 1/800 – ISO 100. Of course, I’d rather work with fixed focal length lenses, but sometimes you have to compromise. Finally, the new 24-240mm lens The Canon RF 24-50mm f/4.5-6.3 lens is priced at £379. It seems to be unique in the Canon range, the nearest lenses being not the same specification or very expensive L series optics. Overall I have the RF 24-70 and the RF 24-105 f4. Both are great lenses but the 24-70 is sharper and the extra stop is great. The 28-70 is sharper still by all reports but it doesn't fit my needs (and my 68 year old hands and wrists). Renting will make up your mind. Just get them for a couple of days. cNZ7Gyt.

canon rf 24 105 f4 review